Mail Archive Search: <+from:jemitchell@compuserve.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jemitchell@compuserve.com: 461 ]

Total 461 documents matching your query.

81. Re: SM2 Stuff /trailered cars (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 20:51:10 -0500; Measured where? There's always zero ground clearance at the tires (hopefully) ;<) Some cars that are currently legal in Stock won't pass the above test. The time constant of the stiffest spring/strut; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00016.html (10,679 bytes)
82. Re: "The Fast & The Furious" - bad news for autocross (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 22:32:15 -0500; I took a firm position several years ago on the subject of those Speed Creeps we've heard so much about. Guys who put "necker knobs" on their steering wheels and date girls who wear tight sweaters an; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00024.html (10,307 bytes)
83. Re: SM2 Stuff (long) (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:11:53 -0500; extent. be. Yes it is. You may elect to tolerate a stiff-riding, un-airconditioned car on the street, but you can't extend from that to claim that a competitive SM ride will generally be considered "; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00041.html (10,771 bytes)
84. Ft. Worth Tour speeds (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:37:52 -0500; As yet another entrant in the event and one who is always concerned with event safety, let me add my $.02: there were no - I repeat, NO - safety issues with the courses at this event. Neither absolut; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00379.html (7,694 bytes)
85. Re: Speed Creep - Powers to Be Opinion (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:12:34 -0500; As another event entrant who presented my views earlier, I offer the same qualifier. The apocalypse is near. I agree entirely with the above statement. I've already made my views known on this subjec; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00404.html (9,783 bytes)
86. Re: Speed Creep - Powers to Be Opinion (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:53:33 -0500; That's entirely correct. However, the upper speed limits as stated in the rules present several problems: 1. The phrase "should not normally exceed" leaves lots of room (maybe too much) for interpret; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00407.html (10,997 bytes)
87. Re: Speed Creep - Powers to Be Opinion (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:03:33 -0500; than safety. Whereas there are always competitive equity issues involved in any consideration of course speeds, the SSC (that's the Solo Safety Committee, get it?) has now taken an interest in the ma; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00419.html (9,508 bytes)
88. Re: Speed Increases (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 11:41:32 -0500; I think there are three issues: 1) the safety/legality of the Ft. Worth Tour courses, 2) the appropriateness (or lack of same) for Solo II of the higher speeds in courses like the Tour courses, and 3; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00547.html (10,247 bytes)
89. Re: best roadster? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:04:38 -0500; <snip> seen a number I'd have to say that, with 4 of the 6 trophy spots (including first place) in AS at the Ft. Worth Tour, there are apparently a few drivers out there who've managed to learn to dr; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00595.html (7,919 bytes)
90. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:06:34 -0500; to implement As if you're privy to such plans when and if they're made. What exactly is your official position with the SCCA again? current SP vehicles as driven competitors have new cars - Define"ne; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00718.html (10,362 bytes)
91. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:58:13 -0500; Dennis gets going again: No, let's look at Nats 2000 _entries_. And compare SP with Stock, Prepared, Mod, and SM. The demographics of a class involve more than just the winning car. Once again, SP ai; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00724.html (9,044 bytes)
92. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 18:35:06 -0500; I don't think that's what is being proposed. Instead, the (currently two if you stretch the point quite a bit) SM "classes" would be combined with the SP classes they most closely resemble (in Dennis; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00729.html (9,661 bytes)
93. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:03:36 -0500; Dennis continues: It's your idea, not mine. The unsupported assertions are also yours. Ergo, the burden of proof is yours. Make your case re the "failure" of SP. Define "success" and "failure," and b; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00735.html (12,201 bytes)
94. Re: SM/SP (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 06:44:14 -0500; Oh, I wouldn't go that far. I've never heard of anyone suffering an injury or debilitating disease because of a team.net post. And Dennis seems to survive whatever mistreatment he receives here. He c; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00770.html (10,972 bytes)
95. Dennis' Agenda (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:43:52 -0500; Here's a link to an interesting post of Dennis' on the sut (Street Mod) list. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stu/message/5282 I'll quote a couple of lines here: "If I could have morphed SP into SM wit; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00771.html (7,722 bytes)
96. Re: Dennis' Agenda (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 12:33:14 -0500; Uhh, well, because it works. It's well-subscribed. Look at Nationals attendance. Or Tours. I'd suggest reading the "core values" portion of the Solo II rulebook as well. with the and parts maintainin; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00785.html (9,646 bytes)
97. Re: Dennis's Agenda (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 16:14:23 -0500; meeting the to change Yes, I remember quite well your team.net posts arguing that that turbos should be opened up in SP. And the "Prussian" vs. "Bohemian" dissertation. Seems like you were also advoc; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00803.html (8,635 bytes)
98. Re: Dennis' Agenda (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 07:14:32 -0500; Dennis sent team.net a verbatim copy of message he had put on the stu list. It got a little better reception there than it did here (big surprise, right?), although I did note that several serious SM; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00831.html (7,489 bytes)
99. Re: Neons on the same line and related SP thingies (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 07:13:57 -0600; That wording was _proposed_ in FasTrack one year, and it was received (not surprisingly) VERY poorly. It never made it into the rulebook. The consensus (and common sense) was that, if the SEB doesn't; /html/autox/2001-02/msg00598.html (7,944 bytes)
100. Re: NASCAR officials say Earnhardt's belt ripped (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 18:40:25 -0600; Unless it had something wrong with it in the first place. I'm sure they'd do that regardless, but the crash didn't look severe enough to me to cause a fatality. The nose of the car was not crushed th; /html/autox/2001-02/msg00612.html (9,308 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]