Mail Archive Search: <+from:jemitchell@compuserve.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jemitchell@compuserve.com: 461 ]

Total 461 documents matching your query.

321. Re: Neon ACR and the SCCA (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 15:13:08 -0500; cam ACR's Nationals. The the next, Super Goes to shows how much attention you've been paying.... The Bwahahahaha! Yeah, let's all get paranoid about a sub-15k ringer "ruining" D Stock. Be very afraid; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00463.html (9,822 bytes)
322. Re: SCCA Politics (score: 1): Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Jun 1999 20:33:35 -0700; Once again, false premises are being used to arrive at faulty conclusions. First, the premises: 1. Showroom Stock is, or has been in the last twenty years, "grassroots." Think about this for a few se; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00485.html (8,907 bytes)
323. Re: Braided Steel Brake Lines on 92+ cars. (score: 1): Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 08:36:57 -0700; If you're talking about Stock, the answer is no. Yes. Prior to 1990 or so, the following items were allowed in Stock: 1. Balancing of engine components. See current SP rules. The Stock allowance used; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00619.html (7,990 bytes)
324. Re: Braided Steel Brake Lines on 92+ cars. (score: 1): Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 08:43:19 -0700; <snip> Spoke too soon on that one. I've just looked in several past rulebooks, going back to 1988, and I can find no reference in Stock to this modification. AFAIK, it's not been legal in Stock in th; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00620.html (7,298 bytes)
325. Finally found it! (was Re: Braided Steel Brake Lines on 92+ cars.) (score: 1): Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 10:42:50 -0700; I made the mistake of looking in the "Brakes" section of the rules for allowance about brake lines. How stupid! The wording Richard quoted is in the preamble to Section 13, and it was first put ther; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00622.html (7,321 bytes)
326. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again. (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 10:11:00 -0500; <snip> system That's a no-brainer. There's gotta be something available over Stock allowances in SP, even for those Evil Turbos. ;<) supercharger engine This only leads to new gray areas. Can the alo; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00729.html (8,597 bytes)
327. Re: Turbo guys.. correction (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 10:28:25 -0500; Duhhh. Shoulda said "Can the engine alone..." then it would make sense. Jay; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00734.html (6,509 bytes)
328. Re: Is ballast legal in stock? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 10:34:23 -0500; <snip a bunch of examples> except your Even the silly paint is OK. The section on "C&C" actually reads, "comfort, convenience, and APPEARANCE items which ... and do not materially REDUCE the weight o; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00736.html (8,450 bytes)
329. Re: Is ballast legal in stock? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 11:10:28 -0500; Eric responds: that I Read my post. "Appearance, comfort, and convenience items ..." Tinting windows meets the requirements of that section: it is for appearance, comfort, or convenience, it doesn't; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00746.html (10,952 bytes)
330. Re: Is ballast legal in stock? (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 11:22:54 -0500; So does installing a 200 lb. power amplifier just behind the rear seat, but that is allowed. Increasing the weight of a car generally does have an effect on performance and/or handling. A negative on; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00750.html (9,530 bytes)
331. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again. (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 11:17:49 -0500; turbo. engine. Well, what about intercoolers, then? They're every bit as much a part of the engine as the turbo, yet they're free in SP. Ditto headers. I see nothing in the new wording that will chan; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00751.html (7,931 bytes)
332. Re: re : MR2 Bolts and Porsche Tensioners (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 11:31:49 -0500; done that that if a TSB the new No, that's about RECALLS, not TSBs. The difference is this: when a mfr. issues a recall, they will perform the update at no cost to the car owner. In fact, they have a; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01081.html (8,166 bytes)
333. Re: PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring Class (score: 1): Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 16:35:18 -0700; <snip> That's the whole ball of wax. You've got to contemplate possible unintended consequences whenever you try to put together a new rules structure. I believe that the intended market for this cla; /html/autox/1999-06/msg01659.html (9,839 bytes)
334. Re: Flip Over at Route 666 (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 12:24:57 -0500; the SCCA (the set by the there and rules. Based on the information presented so far, that would appear to be the case. I haven't participated in this thread because I don't believe that after-the-fac; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00180.html (10,155 bytes)
335. Re: Asking for ideas... (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 11:25:46 -0500; RacerRay52@aol.com wote: <snip a bunch of PAX examples> isn't important outcome reflects Then, I'd suggest you work to get your local region to come up with their own index. compete in at What the he; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00315.html (10,432 bytes)
336. Re: Asking for ideas... (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 15:13:45 -0500; expect on this list any time someone suggests that the current rules are not truly as God intended. Ray's comments just aren't self-consistent. He says on the one hand that he's not "serious," but it; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00336.html (10,202 bytes)
337. Re: Street Tire Handicap (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 11:32:33 -0500; times find that some data is about right. All this is wonderful for local events, but it will never accurately even out the differences between street and autox tires. The actual advantage of sticky; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00405.html (9,796 bytes)
338. Re: Street Tire Handicap (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 13:52:05 -0500; Richard sez: others' We're doing that, but I just don't share the belief that his ideas will help. I think he on street rules?". Ray's been referring to HS as if that's his present class. driving adv; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00421.html (11,906 bytes)
339. Re: photography question (score: 1): Author: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 07:10:44 -0700; It's called "pushing," and it's not an uncommon technique. You have to tell your photo processor that you've pushed the film, and they'll compensate for the underexposure. I've seen somereally nice; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00580.html (8,951 bytes)
340. Re: Byron Short (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 12:43:57 -0500; is? Gotta resist. Stop......typing......aarrrggghhh......can't do it. "Does anybody really know where Byron is, does anybody...." Sung to the tune of "Does anybody really know what time it is" Jay "; /html/autox/1999-05/msg00598.html (6,672 bytes)

Current List: 321 - 340
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]