Mail Archive Search: <+from:SVPViper@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:SVPViper@aol.com: 77 ]

Total 77 documents matching your query.

61. Re: Z06 Corvette and Nationals? (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2000 23:32:23 EDT; Thanks for the responses. So the technical answer at this time is NO! That is what I was looking for. I will let everyone else battle where the car belongs. I think we all agree it belongs in SS... i; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00355.html (10,946 bytes)
62. Re: Z06 Corvette and Nationals? (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 16:16:15 EDT; They come off the line Marked as SS with temporary hoods because they will be shipped to the respective company for new hood fitting. The SS cars go to SLP... for any Y2Y options. That is the grey ar; /html/autox/2000-08/msg00488.html (9,177 bytes)
63. Re: SS/WS6 stock classification (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Thu Jul 06 18:03:22 2000; Yes, '98 and up are the LS-1 variants. I have listed below the "Optional Options for a LS-1 SS Camaro" The WS-6 was a factory 1LE suspension, with less shock valving. The only options from SLP for th; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00202.html (14,882 bytes)
64. Re: WS6/SS (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Sat Jul 08 19:46:18 2000; The 17's vs 16's debate has went on for years, sure you have a little more tread width, but you lose sidewall, which the F-body's need to put down the power. The WS-6 deffinately does not sit a .25"; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00410.html (7,571 bytes)
65. Re: C4-C5 Corvettes in stock (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Mon Jul 10 20:30:25 2000; We are getting away from the point, which should be Best of Breed. If the C4 (which has consitently beaten the C5's) is a Vette, then it should stay in SS. Look at the reclassed AS vette's... no one; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00536.html (10,542 bytes)
66. Re: SM And Nationals (was SM & Lies)... (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Wed Jun 14 12:31:26 2000; How can SCCA expect 15 entries from SM, if it isn't listed as a class!!! That is what kills me, they want to see what turnout they get, but they have not communicated that SM can run at Nationals. If; /html/autox/2000-06/msg00848.html (7,802 bytes)
67. Re: Corvette Z06 - Competition for SS? (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 18:11:37 EDT; << I think the current hardtop Vette has REAL potential in SS. At 3050 lbs, the car is well over 150 lbs lighter than I thought it was going to be. 345hp and huge wheels make for a real sweet car. Th; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00779.html (8,184 bytes)
68. Re: Building A Nationals Winning Car (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Sat, 2 Oct 1999 17:44:54 EDT; I have to disagree... When Scotty Called ESP "CP Light"... I took it as meaning less radical! Not quite as much noise, not quite as much power, not quite as much tire... etc... He wasn't saying we di; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00110.html (6,903 bytes)
69. Re: Subject: RE: C4 Vette (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 17:21:22 EDT; I have to somewhat agree... What then... then everyone needs to get an '89? It is still going to upset someone, and you will lose participation, in either C5's, or ZR-1's, or LT-1's... Wait... I know; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00229.html (6,836 bytes)
70. Re: C4 Vette (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Wed, 6 Oct 1999 22:02:04 EDT; Ok... sorry... first of all, who can purchase a "NEW" C4? Nobody... so your argument, with the vintage class... is still stale! If we put the RX-7's into a Vintage class.. the C4's are gonna have to; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00389.html (9,396 bytes)
71. Re: Sway Bars (2)??? (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 19:11:28 EDT; I think it is a good idea one way or the other... Either 1.) No sway bar mod whatsoever... or 2.) Modify only one sway bar of your choice... Front OR Rear. Peace, Dave; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00663.html (6,718 bytes)
72. Re: swaybar info(2) (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 20:52:35 EDT; I don't know... I guess that is like saying we can change only the front shocks, but not the rear shocks. No... I don't want to lose our Shock rule... But to say "Only" the front bar is outdated. Eit; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00750.html (8,009 bytes)
73. Re: Sway Bars (2)??? (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 21:31:34 EDT; I have to agree somewhat with the Rob... It doesn't really make sense in Street Prepared, to let you spend $2,000 on a Trans to update and backdate, but you can't spend $200.00 on a set of gears that; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00841.html (7,682 bytes)
74. Re: Camber kit question (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 12:50:39 EDT; Does anyone know if they make these types of Bolts for the New 2000 S4, or A4 Thanks, Dave; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00873.html (7,685 bytes)
75. Re: Camber kit question (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 15:56:12 EDT; Sam you are right... changing bolts in Shocks, has no effect. I was talking about changing them in the Control Arms... If they made a crash bolt there, then you would gain the camber. Peace, Dave; /html/autox/1999-10/msg00889.html (7,428 bytes)
76. How many people Dissapointed with Mr. Video? (Was Mr Video?????) (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 11:40:38 EDT; I just recieved mine last night. DSL, and ESP South course. It is 2 tapes. The 2nd tape the guy didn't even record the last 90' left. He just sat there on the straight away part! Does anyone have a c; /html/autox/1999-10/msg01449.html (7,118 bytes)
77. RE: "mea culpa" addendum (score: 1): Author: SVPViper@aol.com; Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 23:36:33 EDT; Ok.... Although I don't necessarily agree with Jason's Proposal for the move of C4 corvettes to AS. And I think he really did this as more of a stir up the pot type issue... However I think is point; /html/autox/1999-09/msg01987.html (7,901 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 77
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]