- 1. .75" clutch master in an early TR6? (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve Cirimele" <steve@catnamedkitty.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 12:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
- Hey there Listers, I'm thinking of purchasing a new Clutch Master Cylinder to help overcome the infamous "difficulty of clutch disengagement" problem. The holes are out of round on both my clutch ped
- /html/6pack/2003-09/msg00021.html (8,961 bytes)
- 2. Re: .75" clutch master in an early TR6? (score: 1)
- Author: tr6taylor@webtv.net (Sally or Dick Taylor)
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
- Steve--I don't know if the .75 MC is still available. This is the bore size that was on the early TR, but replaced in subsequent models with the .70 when some owners complained about the pedal being
- /html/6pack/2003-09/msg00027.html (8,468 bytes)
- 3. Re: .75" clutch master in an early TR6? (score: 1)
- Author: "JEFFREY FETNER" <FETNERJ001@hawaii.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:46:10 +0600
- I once put a rebuilt .75 MC from a TR250 on my '72 6 and didn't notice any better clutch action. I still had to push the clutch all the way in to disengage. I just put a Spitfire actuating arm on th
- /html/6pack/2003-09/msg00028.html (10,266 bytes)
- 4. Re: .75" clutch master in an early TR6? (score: 1)
- Author: Don Malling <dmallin@attglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 05:49:39 -0400
- My understanding is the TR250 and the early TR6 through '70 CC52952 used the .75. Triumph changed it to .70 to decrease the pedal pressure -- about 7% I think. My understanding is the slave cylinders
- /html/6pack/2003-09/msg00029.html (9,928 bytes)
- 5. Re: .75" clutch master in an early TR6? (score: 1)
- Author: Irv Korey <emanteno@attglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 06:44:44 -0500
- TR4 and 4A clutch master cylinders will not work on a TR6. They (as well as the brake master cylinders) require TR4/4A pedal assemblies which operate in reverse to the way in which the TR6 pedals ope
- /html/6pack/2003-09/msg00030.html (8,613 bytes)
- 6. Re: .75" clutch master in an early TR6? (score: 1)
- Author: "mitch vamos" <mitchvamos@operamail.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 14:16:36 +0100
- I picked a.75 MC up from Moss a couple weeks ago and put it on my 71. Doesn't seem that stiff really. It had a plastic cap but your original silver one screws right on. -- ___________________________
- /html/6pack/2003-09/msg00031.html (9,262 bytes)
- 7. RE: .75" clutch master in an early TR6? (score: 1)
- Author: "R. Ashford Little II" <ralittle2@mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:28:42 -0400
- Hey Steve, I've got one on my '70 TR6. I put in on a year or so ago and ordered mine from TRF. No problems whatsoever. R. Ashford Little II www.geocities.com/ralittle2 Hey there Listers, I'm thinking
- /html/6pack/2003-09/msg00032.html (9,582 bytes)
- 8. Re: .75" clutch master in an early TR6? (score: 1)
- Author: Btp44@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:23:26 EDT
- Steve-The .75" clutch master cylinder is available from TRF, Moss, BPNW, and others. I used it to cure a release problem, as it does provide a little extra throw at the slave cyl and is more tolerant
- /html/6pack/2003-09/msg00033.html (8,159 bytes)
- 9. Re: .75" clutch master in an early TR6? (score: 1)
- Author: Dale <tpdwinch@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:08:56 -0700 (PDT)
- I am in the process of a different engine swap. Though I am trying to keep as much stock TR-6 parts as possible. With the swap I needed a little more travel on my clutch throw out arm than the stock
- /html/6pack/2003-09/msg00035.html (9,449 bytes)
- 10. Re:.75" clutch master in an early TR6? (score: 1)
- Author: "Russ Pagano" <pagano@comcast.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 19:48:22 -0400
- I replaced the 0.70 CMC with the 0.75 bore. There was a slight difference in movement at the slave pushrod along with slightly increased pedal effort. 7% seems about right although I don't know enoug
- /html/6pack/2003-09/msg00038.html (10,010 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu