To: | "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TR] K & N air filters |
From: | John Macartney <flywheelcoventry1@yahoo.co.uk> |
Date: | Sat, 19 May 2012 14:23:48 +0100 (BST) |
Delivered-to: | mharc@autox.team.net |
Delivered-to: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s1024; t=1337433828; bh=oDDkU/4Ni1VYZPq6R5ZhcK9kBRL0EwB4JFC5wpGADHs=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4ZiUqajNqigl8aAVTDscMP02f1YGnqtNTz6tV6EnxLVlzvp3vAaU01LFdx8uKUgaIxRh9t+1Xo5zbXu+/fr7iJWBAjhxynrW2wz4SU9Mr3E9zeezAJGvFQpl8FjAkmueaf/C7H3gXiS++An9TL7pSyMh6jHzZbugOMpM3gDoSNM= s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=X2o5fwMqp45M7SqLytpwacXl9Jmt9t8mB/WhRNiIEMOX7YTw6KocbW9T617z+pvoh9KXX97asbP3OOIy/6eUGH19FXV38kSmMgHhQO4NGIbeAtjY0aBoLWl5XDEduvPfqskfcLUJcgP8/UpXTKJygovvv9qaTcDNUcO5sdGqoes=; |
In-reply-to: | <20120519110943.ED0FA2D0475@autox.team.net> |
List-archive: | <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/triumphs> |
List-help: | <mailto:triumphs-request@autox.team.net?subject=help> |
List-id: | Triumph Sports car discussion <triumphs.autox.team.net> |
List-post: | <mailto:triumphs@autox.team.net> |
List-subscribe: | <http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs>, <mailto:triumphs-request@autox.team.net?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: | <http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs>, <mailto:triumphs-request@autox.team.net?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: | <20120519110943.ED0FA2D0475@autox.team.net> |
Reply-to: | John Macartney <flywheelcoventry1@yahoo.co.uk> |
Sender: | triumphs-bounces@autox.team.net |
IMHO, the KN filter is a waste of money. I had two on my Triumph 2000, noticed nothing in terms of 'increased performance' (but then I don't believe such claims anyway) and certainly no increase in the amount of filth the KN retained in comparison to my conventional Unipart paper filter. That said, mere observation is an inaccurate method of efficacy measurement but I was and still am far from convinced. I've also asked many people if they believed the advertising hype, seen increased dirt retention or felt the KN was a better option? The answers have been 'No' in all cases - but perhaps those people were all grumpy old *b*****s" just like me? Jonmac ** triumphs@autox.team.net ** Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html Archive: http://www.team.net/archive Forums: http://www.team.net/forums Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/mharc@autox.team.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TR] K & N air filters, John Macartney |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TR] K & N air filters, Robert Jones |
Previous by Thread: | [TR] K & N air filters, John Macartney |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] K & N air filters, Robert Jones |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |