Subject: | [TR] shaking TR3 |
---|---|
From: | dkspence at telus.net (Don) |
Date: | Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:16:51 -0600 |
References: | <mailman.5101.1308361607.3301.triumphs@autox.team.net> |
Geo well the forces would be the same they would be working on a smaller surface (fewer threads) thus in effect multiplying the force per unit of surface area thus being more likely to fail. Even if all 4 did fail the nuts and stripped threads would be held captive but the wheel and splined hub would "leave the building". On 17-Jun-11, at 7:46 PM, triumphs-request at autox.team.net wrote: > I have also wondered this -- when I think about the short stud and > double-bevel nut that secure the wire wheel splined adaptor it seems > (to my > engineering-ignorant mind) that the forces at work would be > comparable to > those in play if the same stud & nut were holding a steel wheel in > place. > > The only difference I can see is that one bevel nut cannot easily > loosen > when the wire wheel is mounted as the hub of the wheel sort of > captures the > nut limiting how much a single nut could undo. > > I, too, offer the 'use only as directed / don't try this at home / > YMMV > disclaimer. > > G |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TR] shaking TR3, Don |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TR] TR service literature needed, Gary Grant |
Previous by Thread: | [TR] shaking TR3, Don |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] Shaking TR3, dave1massey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |