To: | Sholtes IV <joeiv@concentric.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: triumph reliabilty |
From: | Jamie Palmer <jamiep@cris.com> |
Date: | Mon, 04 Nov 1996 21:41:59 -0500 |
Cc: | Coupons69@aol.com, triumphs@autox.team.net |
References: | <961105180334_222899162@emout19.mail.aol.com> <328002EF.3589@mail.concentric.net> |
Joe, well put, but I have one thing to add...and it's true in our case! Sholtes IV wrote: > On the lighter side though, they (TR 6's) do make excellent "second" > cars. By this I mean they can be used for transportation to and from > work, play, or vacation, as long as there is a reliable vehicle to > relieve it in the event of any mechanical disfunction. The above is what the second (and third, fourth, etc...) Triumph is for!! TRuly yours, Jamie Palmer '63 Italia (daily driver!) '73 Stag '72 TR-6 '71 Spit autocrosser '70 Spit (Mom's, just added to the family) '80 TR-7 w/parts car (please buy!!! $1000 for pair) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: '65 Triumph Spitfire4 - Lots of Q's, Sholtes IV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: 6 Cylinder Survey, Nickbk |
Previous by Thread: | Leaky pushrod tubes, Jack W. Drews |
Next by Thread: | triumph reliabilty, Coupons69 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |