triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Automatic Chokes: To Be or Not To Be...

To: David Brock <dmbrock@julian.uwo.ca>
Subject: Re: Automatic Chokes: To Be or Not To Be...
From: "John M. Trindle" <jtrindle@tsquare.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 1995 09:36:01 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: triumphs@autox.team.net
On Fri, 21 Apr 1995, David Brock wrote:

> My great news, though I'm sure I'm more excited than anyone else here will
> be, is that after not really doing any pre-storage prep last fall to
> Beverly, my '73 Spit, she needed no more than a bit of a blow-dry to the
> distributor, and she fired right up today.  That, together with an insurance
> slip, and I should be on the road on Sunday!  Yeah!
>
Congrats!
 
> My question stems around automatic vs manual chokes.  My Stromberg is
> currently fitted with a manual, but whenever I engage it, I feel like I'm
> going to rip off the instrument panel.  It's a two-handed job.  I wonder if
> anyone has any opinions about manual chokes on these carbs, and any reasons
> why it would be advisable to go either way?
> (Okay, okay. I'm also lazy and don't want to have to remember to use it)

You have a kinked or frayed choke cable.  I had the same problem on the B 
and lived with it for a few months... but replacing the cable made 
operation much smoother.  There was indeed a kink inside the cable where 
I routed it improperly.

My impression is that the manual chokes are a lot more reliable than the 
automatic ones in that vintage.  Luckily I haven't had the option in my LBCs.

John M. Trindle | jtrindle@tsquare.com | Tidewater Sports Car Club
'73 MGB DSP     | '69 Spitfire E Stock | '88 RX-7 C Stock
Home Page:  http://www.widomaker.com/~trindle
"9.  Creativity is great, but plagiarism is faster.  (The fifth law of
reality.) - Jack Neafsey"


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>