>Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:26:33 -0700
>To: Jim Parent <jparent@yahoo.com>
>From: tiger technologies <tartanad@popd.ix.netcom.com>
>Subject: Re: Fraud?
>
>Jim:
>Be careful who you call a dweeb. Jan was not the only guy to inspect that
piece of kaka Tiger conversion. And everything Jan reported I back up in
spades. The guy who purchased that car at auction--or the auctioneer who HAD
to know it was a fake should be hung from their toploader.
>Jeff/TT
>At 11:19 PM 8/23/98 -0700, you wrote:
>>Hey dweeb,
>>
>>I was just clarifying a quote in another message.
>>
>>I don't appreciate your sarcasim. Get the hell of my back.
>>
>>I don't disagree. I was just suprised that I thought I read about a
>>change in policy.
>>
>>You jump everybody?
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Jim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---JAN HARDE <harde@cyberesc.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jim,
>>>
>>> Hmmmmm, let me see---we authenticate cars....for what purpose....to
>>know
>>> which ones are not real???
>>> and if we know the ones that are not?? should people not know ??
>>every other
>>> club does!!!
>>>
>>> Ahhhhhh Daaahhhh why else authenticate, certainly not for the TAC
>>people to
>>> play a solitaire game of let's guess the ALGER...(good game by the
>>way for
>>> the fall line up on ABC)..
>>> We want to HELP one another make educated and informed decisions on
>>the
>>> purchase of a car, with cars selling @ $ 30K++ and in a few years who
>>> knows?? Let's find a way to get behind the TAC, get inspectors all
>>over the
>>> planet, and inspectors that will go out to check out a car for a
>>prospective
>>> buyer, sort of like the Shelby club has done for years...TEAM work
>>....
>>> With some 7000 cars built, and around 3 or only 400 TAC'ed so far,
>>and most
>>> in CA, the process as it is going will be done TAC'ing all the cars
>>in 2127,
>>> and my great great grandson will be at the finale party, to be held
>>on the
>>> Moon, the cite of the 2127 SUNI XXXVIII.
>>>
>>> See Ya' Jan....
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jim Parent <jparent@yahoo.com>
>>> To: tigers@autox.team.net <tigers@autox.team.net>
>>> Date: Sunday, August 23, 1998 3:06 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Fraud?
>>>
>>>
>>> >With regard to:
>>> >
>>> >"I have been told that the car has been inspected by certified
>>> >"experts"(not Norm) and the physical evidence clearly shows that Norm
>>> >is correct.
>>> >So, Henry, I believe your "innocent until proven guilty"
>>> >philosophy......."
>>> >
>>> >I thought that the ONLY thing that TAC noted was cars that were, in
>>> >thier opinion, authentic. How is it then, that in this case, that
>>TAC
>>> >is confirming a conversion? Has the TAC policy changed? This is a
>>> >big step as far as liabilities are concerned.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Regards,
>>> >
>>> >Jim
>>> >B9470139
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
|