Jim,
Now that is not very nice, especially since I made no personal attack on
you, and my name is still Jan.
And You have a GREAT week as well..
My skin is rather thick.. but I did not mean to offend you, only to look at
this in a manner to help to get change..
Jan...
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Parent <jparent@yahoo.com>
To: JAN HARDE <harde@cyberesc.net>
Date: Sunday, August 23, 1998 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: Fraud?
>Hey dweeb,
>
>I was just clarifying a quote in another message.
>
>I don't appreciate your sarcasim. Get the hell of my back.
>
>I don't disagree. I was just suprised that I thought I read about a
>change in policy.
>
>You jump everybody?
>
>Regards,
>
>Jim
>B9470139
>
>
>
>
>---JAN HARDE <harde@cyberesc.net> wrote:
>>
>> Jim,
>>
>> Hmmmmm, let me see---we authenticate cars....for what purpose....to
>know
>> which ones are not real???
>> and if we know the ones that are not?? should people not know ??
>every other
>> club does!!!
>>
>> Ahhhhhh Daaahhhh why else authenticate, certainly not for the TAC
>people to
>> play a solitaire game of let's guess the ALGER...(good game by the
>way for
>> the fall line up on ABC)..
>> We want to HELP one another make educated and informed decisions on
>the
>> purchase of a car, with cars selling @ $ 30K++ and in a few years who
>> knows?? Let's find a way to get behind the TAC, get inspectors all
>over the
>> planet, and inspectors that will go out to check out a car for a
>prospective
>> buyer, sort of like the Shelby club has done for years...TEAM work
>....
>> With some 7000 cars built, and around 3 or only 400 TAC'ed so far,
>and most
>> in CA, the process as it is going will be done TAC'ing all the cars
>in 2127,
>> and my great great grandson will be at the finale party, to be held
>on the
>> Moon, the cite of the 2127 SUNI XXXVIII.
>>
>> See Ya' Jan....
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Parent <jparent@yahoo.com>
>> To: tigers@autox.team.net <tigers@autox.team.net>
>> Date: Sunday, August 23, 1998 3:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: Fraud?
>>
>>
>> >With regard to:
>> >
>> >"I have been told that the car has been inspected by certified
>> >"experts"(not Norm) and the physical evidence clearly shows that Norm
>> >is correct.
>> >So, Henry, I believe your "innocent until proven guilty"
>> >philosophy......."
>> >
>> >I thought that the ONLY thing that TAC noted was cars that were, in
>> >thier opinion, authentic. How is it then, that in this case, that
>TAC
>> >is confirming a conversion? Has the TAC policy changed? This is a
>> >big step as far as liabilities are concerned.
>> >
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >
>> >Jim
>> >B9470139
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>_________________________________________________________
>DO YOU YAHOO!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
|