Fred, I will ignore this for now but if I were you I would start sleeping
like a Dolphin.
LM
-----Original Message-----
From: Fred Krampits <fred@hprrc725.rose.hp.com>
To: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>
Cc: spridgets@Autox.Team.Net <spridgets@Autox.Team.Net>
Date: 11 September, 1998 10:44 AM
Subject: Can't we all just get along?
>Frank Clarici wrote:
>>
>> Alan Fisher wrote:
>> >
>> > Just wanted to thank everyone for the comments.
>> > Some quite warm and others not so, Only kidding!!!!!
>> > So far no sleepless nights here but understand it's just a
>> > matter of time.
>> > Thanks again and looking forward to that first conversation with Ethan
>> > explaining the difference between a Sprite and a Midget.
>> > Alan
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> The difference between a Sprite and a Midget is obvious!!!
>> The Sprite is just better.
>> (flame sheilds up)
>> --
>> Frank Clarici
>> Toms River, NJ
>> Lots of LBCs
>> http://www.exit109.com/~spritenut
>
>Well:
>I've been very kind to Sprite owners in the past, however I know and
>they know that the Midget starting in 1961 is the same car as the
>Sprite, however just like my old Olds Firenza when compared to a Chevy
>Cavalier, it is a fancier, more luxurious version of the same car. The
>Midget has more chrome, better interior, and superior gauges. Overall
>the Sprite/Midget introduced in 1961 was a better car than the Bugeye,
>especially in 1962 when the Ribcase Tranny was introduced. Bugeye
>Sprites do have their charm, but God help if you ever lose anything in
>the boot. The only way their owners make their car livable nowadays is
>to put in Japanese transmissions and basically change the character of
>the car. Something I don't have to do in my Midget MK I 109CG. But when
>compared to each other, on any model, the Midget always wins on style
>points.
>--
>Deflector shields at full strength.
>
>Fred Krampits
>1963 MG Midget MK I 1098CG
>
>http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/9021/
>
|