spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Oil Filter Adapter.

To: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>
Subject: Re: Oil Filter Adapter.
From: "Patrick D. Baize" <ArtVanGo@swbell.net>
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 10:04:02 -0500
I was looking for a filter for my spitfire (63) that I am currently
restoring.  I used Frams computer and it gave me a part numberr of FRAM
PH16  but noted that I may need a filter adaptor..  Well I do because the
threads on the filter are larger than the adaptor on the engine..

Question . The adaptor advertised in VB , is that the one needed for today's
filters.

Pat (63 Spit)

Joe Curry wrote:

> Hey gang!
>
> If any of you remember a thread that ran sometime last year on an "Oil
> Filter Adapter" for Spitfire engines, I discovered today what that was
> all about.
>
> If any of you recall, I couldn't for the life of me figure out why the
> subject was even raised.  I knew that all Spitfire engines came from the
> factory with a spin-on filter so what is up with this "adapter thread"?
>
> Here is what I discovered:
>
> I obtained a Rover UNIPART 1xGFE 150 filter and proceeded to change the
> oil.  I removed the NAPA Gold 1374 filter and started to install the
> UNIPART one.  To my amazement, the hole in the filter was smaller than
> the one in the NAPA one.  On further examination, I realized the threads
> were the same as the part of the adapter that screwed into the block.
> On a lark, I removed the filter from the 1300 engine I plan to install
> in Tiny Tim and found that it had the same threads on both ends.  So now
> Huxley has a Unipart filter and I still wonder why Triumph did that.
>
> Anybody able to lay any magic words on me to explain this?
>
> Regards,
> Joe
> --
> "If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort."
>  -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>