Subject: | [Mgs] Seat Belts |
---|---|
From: | chillmog at sbcglobal.net (Charles Hill) |
Date: | Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:22:39 -0500 |
References: | <00143ED9DF914E2084CB187EED4C9B22@frankdcczr6l6k> <984687.11286.qm@smtp108.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <2886A225-D7BB-43BC-B97C-A14191E71C8C@ghs.com.au> |
Murray, This is getting in to dangerous territory. It has nothing to do with wearing seat belts but government mandates. To over-simplify, what might be an acceptable law in one country could provoke rebellion in another. Charles Hill On 7/2/2011 4:41 PM, Murray Arundell wrote: > OK I'll open up a can of worms here..... why is it that Americans were so > opposed to mandatory wearing of seat belts? European, Australians, and pretty > well everyone else in the world just accepted it because it was > sensible...... > > Murray Arundell > Brisbane Australia |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Mgs] Seat Belts, Charles Hill |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Mgs] Seat Belts, WSpohn4 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] Seat Belts, Charles Hill |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] Seat Belts, WSpohn4 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |