Subject: | [Mgs] Seat Belts |
---|---|
From: | rocknatural at gmail.com (The Roxter) |
Date: | Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:16:46 -0500 |
References: | <00143ED9DF914E2084CB187EED4C9B22@frankdcczr6l6k> <984687.11286.qm@smtp108.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <2886A225-D7BB-43BC-B97C-A14191E71C8C@ghs.com.au> |
On 7/2/2011 4:41 PM, Murray Arundell wrote: > OK I'll open up a can of worms here..... why is it that Americans were so > opposed to mandatory wearing of seat belts? European, Australians, and pretty > well everyone else in the world just accepted it because it was > sensible...... > > Murray Arundell > Brisbane Australia Sensible, yes. Within the proper purview of government, NO! Not wearing seatbelts does not endanger anybody else, only ones self. Americans tend to be opposed to meddling nannies telling us how to live, or at least we used to be. -Rocky Frisco -- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Mgs] Seat Belts, The Roxter |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [Mgs] Seat Belts, Charles Hill |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] Seat Belts, The Roxter |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Mgs] Seat Belts, Charles Hill |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |