fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rods?

To: "SHANE Ingate" <hottr6@hotmail.com>, <britcars@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Rods?
From: "kas kastner" <kaskas@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:54:54 -0700
I had an expensive independent engineering firm do a survey of the
TR-6 crankshaft in about 1969 or 1970.  Their recommendation was that nitride
treatment to the crank would improve the strength (livability) 50%. It proved
true.
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: SHANE Ingate
  To: britcars@bellsouth.net
  Cc: fot@autox.team.net
  Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 9:27 AM
  Subject: RE: Rods?


  Barry,

  The low rpms of the TR6 is due to its rubber-band crankshaft.  There are
  nasty resonances at around 6200, and then again at 7800 (I think).  A
  billet-steel crank eliminates that, and the you can wind out the straight
  six to over 8000 with safety (so I have been told, but make sure all other
  components are up to the task).

  Shane Ingate in Maryland

  Barry Rosenberg wrote:
  >Compare your TR6 rods to a TR4's. Ours are almost twice the size. Wish
  >the TR6 would work in a TR4. And with such small rods and pistons, why do
  >they say a TR6 will not live at much over 6,800 rpm or are they just
  >fibbing? Who would be honest and say how high they actually rev their
  >engine. My TR4 limiter is set at 7,200.  Barry

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>