When companies make big decisions everything counts--right up until the
economic decision maker awards the contract to his completely unqualified
fraternity buddy. But complaints and dissatisfaction make it easy to pull
the deal. Locally, there is not a peep about the run offs leaving mid-ohio.
People hate change, you'd expect someone would complain, but all I've heard
is "good, now I don't have to deal with their asshole security guys
anymore."
Amazing.
Bill Babcock
Babcock & Jenkins
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-fot@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-fot@autox.team.net] On Behalf
Of BillDentin@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 6:48 AM
To: Gt6steve@aol.com
Cc: fot@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: 2004 Mid Ohio experience
In a message dated 05/04/2005 6:35:28 PM Central Daylight Time,
Gt6steve@aol.com writes:
> I wonder if SCCA's abandonment of M-O involves similar complaints and
> conversely, does their newfound concern relate to the loss of the Runoffs?
>
Good point. I don't know any high mucky-mucks in the SCCA to find out, but
rather my guess would be it involved geographical considerations....more
central location, close to new headquarters, etc.
Bill
|