fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: negative camber

To: "Bill Babcock" <billbab2@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: negative camber
From: "jaboruch" <jaboruch@netzero.net>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 11:45:57 -0700
----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Babcock <billbab2@yahoo.com>
To: Tony Drews <tmccis@REVEALED.NET>; <fot@autox.team.net>
Cc: <vucinic@b140.aone.net.au>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: negative camber


> The solutions depend on the leniency of your sanctioning body. On my
> TR3 I used a suspension analysis program to select new upper arm
pivot
> points and arm length. I don't remember the actual numbers, but my
> pivot point is moved about 1.5 inches inward and the arm is about
one
> inch shorter.
>
Bill, I got lost on this part.  Are you calling  the pivot points, the
upper fulcrum pin, that is on top of the shock tower?  If that is
inwards 1.5 inches, and the arms 1 inch shorter, then you have
efectively moved the top ball joint inwards 2.5 inches, and must have
10+degrees of camber. I don't think so. Where have I gone wrong?
Joe(B)

_____________________________________________
Click here for FREE Internet Access and Email

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>