hi dave, i think i have to differ with you on the attractiveness of the
tiger(or sunbeam alpine). i think it is much prettier, and better
proportioned than the datsun roadster. the final word on this,
has to be my wife jeanine, who said she LIKED the alpine. in
40 years of marriage, she has never liked any of the other
old cars ive had, including the datsun 2000. just my opinion.
bob smith,ohio
69 srl 311
74 260Z
>
>
>
> To: gkmcc@sbcglobal.net; datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> From: davesmbox@aol.com
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 21:07:09 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Roadsters] Is it a Tiger?
>
> The tiger is actually not an attractive car unlike the roadster and MGB
> Dave
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary McCormick <gkmcc@sbcglobal.net>
> To: Datsun Roadster List <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Tue, May 29, 2012 2:50 pm
> Subject: [Roadsters] Is it a Tiger?
>
>
> I recently switched my Twitter avatar pic to a shot of me in my '70 2000,
and
> ot a message from a follower in New Zealand asking if it was a Sunbeam
Tiger.
> sed to having the Roadster mistaken for an MGB by automotive know-nothings,
> ut the Tiger deal was a first for meb&
> Gary McCormick
> an Jose, CA
> 70 2000 SRL311-13291
> _______________________________________
> datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> Donate: http:/
________________________________________
datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe:
http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/datsun-roadsters/mharc@autox.team.net
|