datsun-roadsters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000

To: "STAN CHERNOFF" <az589@lafn.org>, "Gordon Glasgow" <glasgow@serv.net>,
Subject: Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000
From: "Fred Katz" <fredkatz@2xtreme.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 22:36:14 -0800
Hmmn,... I should've bought a '67.5, would have saved me some cutting time
that I spent on my '66.

Stan, I'll get that check out to you! Thanks,

Fred

----------
> From: STAN CHERNOFF <az589@lafn.org>
> To: Gordon Glasgow <glasgow@serv.net>; roadsters
<datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
> Subject: Re: 67.5 1600 vs 2000
> Date: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 10:18 PM
> 
> Gordon,
> 
> All of the 67.5 cars had the same hole in the transmission tunnel since
the
> shift boot and dust covers were attached to the shift plate.  As long as
> the shift plate is the one for the trans the it works.
> 
> The hole in the trans tunnel is quite long and accomodates both the 4
speed
> and 5 speed shift lever locations.
> 
> Stan
> 
> BTW I have a few 5 speed shift plates for sale.
> ============
> 
> At 08:47 PM 12/8/99 -0800, Gordon Glasgow wrote:
> >No, the 5-speed and 4-speed are different lengths. The hole in the
tunnel
> is in
> >a different location.
> >
> >shifty wrote:
> >
> >> > From: Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us
> >>
> >> > And the shifter holes on the trans tunnel are spaced differently.
> >>
> >> I believe the 67.5 1600 and 2000 shifter holes are the same, the plate
that
> >> goes over them are different.
> >>
> >> San Francisco
> >
> >--
> >Gordon Glasgow
> >http://www.gordon-glasgow.org
> >
> >
> >
> >

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>