ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ST2? STS2?

To: Ms Katie Kelly <katiekelly@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: ST2? STS2?
From: "John J. Stimson-III" <john@harlie.idsfa.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:02:56 -0700
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 11:11:44AM -0700, Ms Katie Kelly wrote:
> Thanks, John, for clarifying. I am not understanding
> this: there is a difference between ST-2 and STS-2?
> I'm so out of the loop.

Yes, there's a difference between ST2 and STS2.

In a nutshell, STS2 was created by the SEB, and the rules are
basically identical to STS except that the allowed cars are 2-seaters
with a 1.9L displacement limit.  The '99- Miatas and MR2 Spyders are
specifically excluded.

ST2 was created by a grassroots group and was adopted by at least 3
regions including SFR.  It is also based on the STS rules but with
more allowances.  Eligible vehicles include anything classed in CS,
ES, GS, or HS, that's not already allowed in STS or STX.  Factory
Torsen LSDs are allowed.

> There is no way in hell I'm replacing my very nice
> stock limited slip to "open". I'll stick with bike
> racing.

That's what a lot of people seem to think.  The official response to
"you should allow helical/Torsen LSDs in STS2" is: "But that would be
STX2, now wouldn't it?"  Maybe they should have started with STX2.

> So a Miata R is legal in ST-2 then? I just want to
> clarify. I'm totally cool with a regional class. I
> just want to autocross sometimes.

A Miata R is legal in ST2.

Oh, and STX is an official national class like STS that allows
turbocharged cars and any limited slip differential.

-- 

john@idsfa.net                                              John Stimson
http://www.idsfa.net/~john/                              HMC Physics '94






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>