If Panoz built it, SCCA would class it in E Mod.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> [mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of Kelly, Katie
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 15:01
> To: Anthony Tabacco; John F. Kelly Jr.
> Cc: ba-autox@autox.team.net
> Subject: RE: Let's Talk Minis...
>
>
> Oh come on now, it's not a Lotus Mini. If Lotus made it, it'd
> be an A Stock car.
>
> Katie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Tabacco [mailto:atabacco@california.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 2:53 PM
> To: John F. Kelly Jr.
> Cc: ba-autox@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Let's Talk Minis...
>
>
> Yea what is it with that? Is it just the name? I rode in a
> "new" Lotus Elan last weekend. Front wheel drive, 1.6 liter,
> radio nice seats, the whole kool-car-but-still-street deal.
> Nice putt but not BStock S2000 240 HP performance. And its an
> ASP, not classifiable as a stock car!? Did poor Colin do
> something to those folks or what? Tony
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>
> To: <ba-autox@autox.team.net>; "'james creasy'"
> <Black94PGT@pacbell.net>; "'Carl Merritt'"
> <CMerritt@luminous.com>; "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}"
> <PETER.THANA@ROCHE.COM>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 2:33 PM
> Subject: RE: Let's Talk Minis...
>
>
> > -------------------- Begin Original Message --------------------
> >
> > Message text written by "Thana, Peter {High~Palo Alto}"
> >
> > "I made my comparison just to point out that a light, nimble, low
> > powered car was such a great idea 10 years ago, I don't
> see why the
> > idea can't work today when just about everything has 200hp."
> >
> > -------------------- End Original Message --------------------
> >
> > SCCA does not like Light nimble, low-powered cars*,
> IMHO, and
> > thus you can expect the SEB to deal with the Mini accordingly.
> >
> > * Personal experience.
> >
> > --John Kelly
|