To: | Bradley Lamont <lamont@xnet.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: ProSolo, Spectators, TV, et al. |
From: | washburn <washburn@dwave.net> |
Date: | Mon, 26 Jun 2000 21:08:07 -0500 |
Bradley Lamont wrote: > > Except for the fact that the first car to the finish line doesn't > necessarily win. Drag racing is extremely simple to participate in and is > extremely simple for spectators to watch and understand. > > ProSolo (since you want to focus on it, instead of Solo) is not. You have > to add 2 times together. You have to pay attention to both sides to know > who wins. This adds a level of complexity that spectators may not care for. > Easily solvable by adding spectator specific timing boards. It is not above today's technology to come up with a more legible, multi-purpose display that does the math for you, and tells you "time-to-beat", who won each side, and stuff like that. Not too hard if you really want to do it. While I'm not really sure what to think about the whole spectator side of this, I do agree that the two car setup a Pro offers is by far more interesting to watch. Pat |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | New guy, online forums, Christopher Hammond |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: General list comment - Pro Solo / SoloII, Scot Zediker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: ProSolo, Spectators, TV, et al., washburn |
Next by Thread: | Re: ProSolo, Spectators, TV, et al., dg50 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |