Erik, I don't remember who posted the excerpt you sent with you message,
but he is obviously not someone with ambitions. And, as he stated, he
has no business cluttering up a high-level event. What I don't
understand is what makes people like him think they can tell me or anyone
else,"I have no ambition so you shouldn't have any either."
I and many others like me agree with you. Have you ever noticed that if
people agree with you you get no support but if they disagree you are
usually charred?
Jon FP 73
Way ahead of Katie now!
On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 12:20:52 -0500 Erik Van-der-Mey
<autox@webcentrix.net> writes:
> >It's simple, I think. I think that there _should_ be some sort of
> >prerequisites involved in entering a national level Solo II event,
> and I
> >say that as one of the people who should NOT be there. I'm not
> going to
> >squall on about the bad elitist snob people keeping me out. There
> are a
> >bunch of us who don't belong at such an event. "Huh?" you say?
>
> All this banter about who is qualified and who is not is ignoring
> the
> issue of event math. The more entrants, the longer the day gets
> (running only one course). Event limits should be based on first
> come, first served. If you register too late, too bad.
>
> I posted earlier on this topic and I guess no one noticed...
>
> See subject: Solo Event Math (was: Solo participation too high?)
>
> Regards,
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Erik Van-der-Mey
> erik@nolimitsperformance.com
> No Limits Performance, Inc.
> http://nolimitsperformance.com
>
|