autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: WS-6 classed wrong too ? Was: Re: Shotz's WS-6 Prep Level

To: Scotty *BOB* White <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
Subject: Re: WS-6 classed wrong too ? Was: Re: Shotz's WS-6 Prep Level
From: bob1 <bob1@sns-access.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 10:17:23 -0700

Scotty *BOB* White wrote:
> 
> >The WS-6 in stock form is classed in SuperStock (not to say it has a
> >prayer of competing there).
> 
> Boy I hat to get involved in this... But, by your logic earlier Jeff, it
> would seem as though the SS Camaro and WS6 Bird should be in ASP then ;-)
> 
And Jeff wrote:
> > > 
> > > Marcus Meredith suggested in his letter to put it in BSP. 
> > Isn't his name Mark Maradash ?
> 
> No.
OK, it's Maradash who is the benchmark, (not Shotz) since he won last year by 
over
1 sec.
So Jeff, Please explain why it is OK for someone to take a WS-6,
from SS, PAX = .830 to ESP, with easier PAX 0.822, add mods and be fair to
other ESP folks ?  I think there  is more than one car wrong with ESP.  Either 
the PAx
is wrong or the WS-6 is classed wrong too. Can you think of one other car 
(besides
these two) that can add mods and get easier classing ?

At least the BMW comes from AS, PAX .815, and gets a harder PAX in ESP....
(This will be in *my* letter to SEB  :)
Robert Larson

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>