| To: | "'Linnhoff, Eric'" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: M3's in ESP - Mid Season Opinion |
| From: | Jeff Winchell <jwinchell@Giftspot.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 May 2000 15:26:01 -0700 |
>They don't "fit" the profiles of FSP, DSP, CSP or BSP at all. They put rear-wheel drive cars in with all-wheel drive cars. Talk about course dependency (or should I say weather dependency). On a related note, why was so much work spent on redoing the SP classes and adding a new class, only to still leave a huge performance gap between the ASP/BSP/CSP cars, and the DSP/ESP/FSP cars? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Tipping the scales, Mark J. Bradakis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Uh oh, M3s in ESP... again! (was: Re: more peru musings), Jeff Winchell |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: M3's in ESP - Mid Season Opinion, Brad Cox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: M3's in ESP - Mid Season Opinion, Phillip S. Osborne |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |