-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Mitchell <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
To: TeamZ3@aol.com <TeamZ3@aol.com>
Cc: autox@autox.team.net <autox@autox.team.net>; 73110.574@compuserve.com
<73110.574@compuserve.com>
Date: Monday, March 22, 1999 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: SP Turbo's
>TeamZ3@aol.com wrote:
>
>> The fact that the SPAC came up with the same idea independently is a
>> validation of the proposed change IMO.
>
>No it's not. It's one pass at a "solution" to an imaginary "problem." I
>asked the question in an earlier post: which SP class has been dominated
>by a turbo car just because it had the turbo? If the only answer you can
>come up with is an SS car that runs in an SP class with a softer PAX
>than it had in Stock, then I claim you haven't even remotely made a
>case.
How about an RX7TT in ASP? It ran the first year with 0 development time
and finished top 5? The next year it won, the next year the driver ran like
4 whole events all year and finished 5th? Then sold and won again.....
Hmmmmm......
sbw
|