but a 300ZX (especially the 2+2) is more of a GT, not a sportscar. :-)
oops... don't want to start that "What is a sportscar" debate.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Esra [mailto:pesra@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 01, 1999 1:36 PM
> To: Scot-Man@email.msn.com; jerry@moutons.org;
> ba-autox@autox.team.net;
> autox@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: Street Touring Category Rules are Updated for 1999
>
>
> The exact wording includes "non-sportscar based" or some such. I
> wouldn't protest you, but you wouldn't be technically legal. Might be
> better to buy that shifter kart.
>
> phil
>
>
> >From: "Scot Zediker" <Scot-Man@email.msn.com>
> >To: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>,
> > "Bay Area Autocross List" <ba-autox@autox.team.net>,
> > "Team.Net autocross" <autox@autox.team.net>
> >Subject: Re: Street Touring Category Rules are Updated for 1999
> >Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:31:56 -0800
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jerry Mouton <jerry@moutons.org>
> >To: Bay Area Autocross List <ba-autox@autox.team.net>; Team.Net
> autocross
> ><autox@autox.team.net>
> >Date: Sunday, January 31, 1999 11:25 PM
> >Subject: Street Touring Category Rules are Updated for 1999
> >
> >
> >
> >Engine size has been increased to 3.1 liters or less, from 2.4.
> >OEM Viscous LSDs are allowed.
> >Street tires are specified to have treadwear 160 or greater, and
> > specific tires are excluded.
> >
> >Hmmm, this raises an interesting question. As all you folks know, I
> drive a
> >300ZX 2+2. Technically, it's a four-seater (though I wouldn't put
> anyone I
> >liked in the back seat!), and it now meets the displacement limit.
> Judging
> >from the times the ST class was turning in yesterday, I think I could
> >compete with them. Should I attempt to exploit this "gray
> area" in the
> >Street Touring rules?
> >
> >Or should I just start saving up for a shifter kart?
> >
> >Scot
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
|