The exact wording includes "non-sportscar based" or some such. I
wouldn't protest you, but you wouldn't be technically legal. Might be
better to buy that shifter kart.
phil
>From: "Scot Zediker" <Scot-Man@email.msn.com>
>To: "Jerry Mouton" <jerry@moutons.org>,
> "Bay Area Autocross List" <ba-autox@autox.team.net>,
> "Team.Net autocross" <autox@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: Street Touring Category Rules are Updated for 1999
>Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 08:31:56 -0800
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jerry Mouton <jerry@moutons.org>
>To: Bay Area Autocross List <ba-autox@autox.team.net>; Team.Net
autocross
><autox@autox.team.net>
>Date: Sunday, January 31, 1999 11:25 PM
>Subject: Street Touring Category Rules are Updated for 1999
>
>
>
>Engine size has been increased to 3.1 liters or less, from 2.4.
>OEM Viscous LSDs are allowed.
>Street tires are specified to have treadwear 160 or greater, and
> specific tires are excluded.
>
>Hmmm, this raises an interesting question. As all you folks know, I
drive a
>300ZX 2+2. Technically, it's a four-seater (though I wouldn't put
anyone I
>liked in the back seat!), and it now meets the displacement limit.
Judging
>from the times the ST class was turning in yesterday, I think I could
>compete with them. Should I attempt to exploit this "gray area" in the
>Street Touring rules?
>
>Or should I just start saving up for a shifter kart?
>
>Scot
>
>
>
>
|