autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 1.6 Miata questions?

To: pesra@hotmail.com, autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: 1.6 Miata questions?
From: SOLOMIATA@aol.com
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:23:37 EST
See my Miata LSD page for the answers to some of your questions.  The VLSD was
an option on base and 'A' package 1.6 Miata's while 'B' packages generally all
had them.

See also the FAQ section of www.Miata.net for some other buying advice.  IMHO,
the 1992 is the best year 1.6 to autocross.  It had the one additional rear
chassis brace over the 90-91 while the 1993 had very slightly softer springs
and one more door beam.   The 90-mid 91 motor also had the early crank snout
design that was prone to breaking if the hub wasn't torqued just right when
the timing belt was changed.

There is a debate (although, does it actually matter?) of which model 1992 is
actually the better autocrosser.  The base model was very light and weighed
anywhere from 2098-2116 lbs. (mine was 2113) while the 1992 LTD had ultralight
(~10.5lbs) 14x6" BBS wheels.  

My only suggestion on a used car purchase is verify the the oil pressure and
compression and then plan on replacing the control arm bushings, they wear out
fast.

Good luck, 
Randy Stocker
http://members.aol.com/solomiata/miataCSP.html


> 
>  I'm trying to decide between a 1.6 miata and a '91 MR2 for next season. 
>  I imagine that it isn't easy to find an old Miata with an lsd. How much 
>  does a new one cost, roughly? How long do they last? How much does it 
>  cost to rebuild/refurbish/whatever you have to do to them when they wear 
>  out?
>  
>  Anyone have an opinion about the best 1.6?  IIRC, Jesse Wills said that 
>  the '92 had some desirable chassis bracing, and that the suspension was 
>  softened in '93. I believe each year got a bit heavier than the last, 
>  correct? Which is more desirable, a light '89 or a stiff '92? 
>  

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>