[TR] Hoses to carbon canister for Triumphs similar to that, used on a TR6 (Sujit Roy)

[DAVID MASSEY]

 Could be.  The TR7 and TR8 both have two canisters but that was later on in the decade as emissions regulations tightened more and more.
 
Dave 

 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Scarbrough <fishplate at gmail.com>
To: Sujit Roy <triumphstag at gmail.com>; Triumphs (triumphs at autox.team.net) <triumphs at autox.team.net>
Sent: Tue, Sep 1, 2020 7:08 am
Subject: Re: [TR] Hoses to carbon canister for Triumphs similar to that, used on a TR6 (Sujit Roy)

Could it be that the California cars had two canisters?
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:50 AM Sujit Roy <triumphstag at gmail.com> wrote:

I think but am not sure that the '71 Stag originally came with a canister with 2 ports. But unfortunately, know one has confirmed. In some of the manuals and parts books, there are illustrations of the Stag having 2 2-port canisters.Stag no1 has a carburetor swap to a later Mk2 set. The Mk2 2 Stag has a 3-port canister. The ports on this type are vertical. I was able to find a 3 port canister from a junkyard. It came out of an MGB. THis canister didn't have a restrictor.Sujit
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 6:03 AM DAVID MASSEY <dave1massey at cs.com> wrote:

 Interesting.  The early TR6 (without Anti-Run-On valve) didn't have this restrictor.  Nor did it have the third port for the hoses that go to the top of the float chambers.  These were added to support the Anti-Run-On valve.  But if the Stag doesn't have the Anti-Run-On valve why did they use this canister?  I guess they used what was on the shelf at the time which is the part used on the TR6 at the time.
 
Dave 

 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Sujit Roy <triumphstag at gmail.com>
To: Q <HDRider570 at att.net>
Cc: Triumphs <triumphs at autox.team.net>
Sent: Thu, Aug 27, 2020 9:52 pm
Subject: Re: [TR] Hoses to carbon canister for Triumphs similar to that, used on a TR6 (Sujit Roy)

Thanks Edward. Yes the middle one to the valve cover. Small piece of plastic with a small hole in it. 
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020, 11:44 AM Q <HDRider570 at att.net> wrote:

There is a flow reducer bushing placed into one of the canister ports 
that is often missing.?? I don't remember which port but it is shown of 
the parts diagram.


Edward Hamer

Petaluma CA

** triumphs at autox.team.net **

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs  http://www.team.net/archive

Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/triumphstag@gmail.com

** triumphs at autox.team.net **

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs  http://www.team.net/archive

Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/dave1massey@cs.com



-- 
Sujit Roy
Cupertino, California
https://triumphstagblog.wordpress.com/

** triumphs at autox.team.net **

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs  http://www.team.net/archive

Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/fishplate@gmail.com

** triumphs at autox.team.net **

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/pipermail/triumphs  http://www.team.net/archive

Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/dave1massey@cs.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/triumphs/attachments/20200901/90dd9b24/attachment.htm>