[TR] distributor advance

[Paul Tegler]

Having studied this over and over again, even have gone as far as 
redesigning the whole timing system (during a F.I and full wasted spark 
conversion)� ... and with simple physics behind me I can comfortably say 
your empirical data has to be flawed....no nice way to say it.

simple physics.... a tighter (stronger) spring will not extend as far as 
a lighter spring under the same weight applied.

Either you jostled something in the initial setup/study, or your post 
spring work setup shifted something, throwing one of the two data sets 
out as a valid data reference.

Either way,,,,this is possibly a mute point if it is now all working for 
you as expected.� :-)

ptegler


On 3/2/2020 2:15 PM, Peter Arakelian wrote:

> >> A stiffer spring would have not allowed the weights to swing out as 
> far
> at lower rpms. It would NOT ADD idle advance over the original
> settings.<<
>
> I admit that I believed the stronger springs would reduce centripetal 
> advance at idle .� But the empirical evidence shows otherwise.� When I 
> put the
>
> stiffer springs in the timing at idle ADVANCED 10-15 degrees.� It is 
> very stable.
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for 
> Windows 10
>
-- 
Paul Tegler
ptegler at verizon.net  www.teglerizer.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/triumphs/attachments/20200302/a2fb7945/attachment.htm>