[TR] Pilot bush TR3A

[Anthony Rhodes]

When I replaced the pilot bush in my 4A many years ago, the original bush came out easily.   It was not an interference fit al all.  

This was an original 30K mile engine, so I believe that fit was intended by the factory. The replacement bushing from TRF fit exactly the same.

-Tony

Sent from my 1837 Babbage Analytical Engine

> On Nov 26, 2017, at 2:00 PM, triumphs-request at autox.team.net wrote:
> 
> Message: 13
> Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:29:56 -0500
> From: "Jerry Van Vlack" <jerryvv at roadrunner.com>
> To: "James Henningsen" <trguy75 at gmail.com>, "TERRY SMITH"
>    <terryrs at comcast.net>
> Cc: triumphs at autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [TR] Pilot bush TR3A
> Message-ID: <09FF21819F774C4598E02ED958C07112 at VlackTK121647>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Interesting discussion. I?m currently rebuilding my TR4A engine and have 3 pilot bearings. One is new and they all fit loosely in the crank. My question is should it be loose in the crank, some I?ve asked say OK and others say no and to locktight it into the crank and or knurl it so that it fits tight. I?d appreciate opinions and reasons for your thoughts. 
> Thanks,
> JVV