[TR] Ready for a change (literally)

glemon at neb.rr.com glemon at neb.rr.com
Wed May 3 17:25:05 MDT 2017


I have used Brad Penn in the past, but have switched to valvoline VR1 the last few years, 20w-50, no problem with either in a Healey 100 and TR250.  When I ran year round way back when I would run 10w-40 or even 10w-30 in the winter, but that was sub freezing and even sub zero temps (my TR4a would start like a champ in these conditions by the way).

I would not worry about running 20w-50 down to 35 f.  10w-30, especially synthetic, is likely to leak more than a thicker oil and I don't think you need to go that light.

Greg Lemon,
TR250
 
---- Bob Labuz <yellowtr at adelphia.net> wrote: 
> Terry,
> 
> I have used Brad Penn 20-50 racing oil in all my Triumphs for about the 
> last 5 years. No problems. Able to get it by the case at a local repair 
> shop. It is available online.
> 
> I used their 30W made for brake in on my 3 and 6 motors. It has the zinc 
> required for our flat tappet engines. I think it is partially synthetic. 
> But formulated from PA crude.
> 
> Bob
> 
>   On 05/03/2017 05:58 PM, TERRY SMITH wrote:
> >
> > Okay.  I started running my TR3 using Valvoline full syn.  At rebuild, 
> > the tappets had shared metal with the cam.  Not using that oil again. 
> >  Switched to Mobil I 10-30 full syn because I read it had high 
> > (correct me, ZDDP???).  But the car leaks oil more than a drip or two 
> > even with carefully applied gaskets and the scroll reduction mod for 
> > the rear seal (which others say isn't all that effective).
> >
> >
> > I really hate to bring this all up again, but one recommendation here 
> > was a Penzoil syn product.  If lubricant retention is a problem with 
> > Mobil I, then exactly what are people running?
> >
> >
> > I also need to add, I'm a daily driver, not occasional.  Drive in 
> > March to work at 35 degrees in the morning, through 90 degrees in the 
> > summer, then back to 35 degrees in the Fall, every day, an hour and a 
> > half.
> >
> >
> > Really interested in your thoughts?
> >
> >
> > Terry Smith, '59 TR3A
> >
> > New Hampshire
> >
> >     On May 3, 2017 at 9:25 AM "Reihing, Randall S."
> >     <Randall.Reihing at utoledo.edu> wrote:
> >
> >     Many years ago Mobil 1 caused so many problems we did tests in our
> >     University Fluids Lab using a Saybolt Viscosimeter and other
> >     devices. We discovered that in relatively short time following
> >     engine shutdown, the Mobil 1 drained down so effectively the
> >     thickness of the Mobil 1 residual oil film retained on cylinder
> >     walls was insufficient to prevent metal-to-metal contact at
> >     startup. Even after relatively short intervals, like 24 hours.
> >     Newer synthetic and semi-synthetic oils do not appear to have this
> >     issue. They offer superior protection in engines that see frequent
> >     use, which may be the key. Our 2016 Toyota Camry uses Toyota's
> >     recommended fully synthetic oil and has factory recommended 10,000
> >     mile oil change intervals. No idea what Toyota's recommendation is
> >     for long intervals of non-use, like 30 days or longer. I don't
> >     know if the new synthetic oils have adequate cylinder wall film
> >     retention to resist corrosion during long term storage. For my
> >     1959 TR3A, (titled as a 1960) I still
> >     prefer non-synthetic oils, especially during winter storage, for
> >     their thick film retention on the cylinder walls when the car sits
> >     for an extended period of time.
> >
> >     In a somewhat different area, owners of light aircraft with the
> >     small aircraft engines like the Continental C85 and 0-200 engines
> >     often use Aeroshell semi-synthetic 15W-50 ashless dispersant oil
> >     with a Lycoming developed anti-wear additive that Shell adds to
> >     the oil. This is a premium semi-synthetic oil recommended for use
> >     in these small engines. A lot of people who use this oil in these
> >     small engines like it but for those whose aircraft see limited
> >     use, often going 3-4 weeks between flights, their owners have
> >     sometimes discovered dripping and seeping they never had before
> >     along with increased oil consumption.
> >
> >     In my own experience with a light aircraft powered by the small
> >     Continental 0-200 that was rebuilt to FAA certified zero time
> >     condition and has just 346 hours since rebuild, I found that I
> >     prefer straight 30 or 40 wt. Aeroshell with the same Lycoming
> >     anti-wear additive. I use 40 wt. oil in the summer when temps are
> >     above 80 degrees or so, and straight 30 wt. for cooler
> >     temperatures. This is per the Teledyne/Continental manufacturer
> >     recommendations regarding use of straight weight oils. Following
> >     engine rebuild and break-in, I had switched to the semi-synthetic
> >     Aeroshell oil upon recommendation of the IA (an aircraft mechanic
> >     with FAA certified Inspection Authorization) who performed the
> >     annual inspection. With the 15W-50 semi-synthetic oil the
> >     crankcase breather tube drips at shutdown, an oil film from
> >     crankcase blow-by accumulates on the underside of the aircraft,
> >     and oil consumption is slightly greater. With Aeroshell straight
> >     wt. oil I have no seeping, oil consumption is normal, c
> >     rankcase blow-by is minimal and dripping from the crankcase
> >     breather tube is significantly reduced.
> >
> >     But far more importantly when I was using the Aeroshell 15W-50
> >     semi-synthetic oil, if the aircraft sat for several weeks without
> >     the engine being operated, the oil pump, which sits above the oil
> >     sump, occasionally lost it's prime. When that happens there will
> >     be zero oil pressure at startup and the oil pump never recovers
> >     it's prime. The only recourse is to re-prime the oil pump. This
> >     was never a factor with the straight weight oils I have returned
> >     to and what appears to be, a thicker residual oil film after shut
> >     down. The only explanation for the oil pump never losing it's
> >     prime with straight weight oils has to be retention of a thicker
> >     oil film inside the oil pump cavity and on the new oil pump gears
> >     which were replaced at rebuild. The straight weight oils also
> >     appear to leave a thicker oil film on the cylinder walls offering
> >     greater protection from the effects of ambient humidity when
> >     sitting for 30 days or so without being operated. For winter
> >     storage I now use straight 40 wt. oi
> >     l, operate the engine at normal oil temperature for 10-15 minutes
> >     and shut down. Desiccant plugs replace the spark plugs and every
> >     3-4 weeks the prop is rotated by hand to re-distribute any oil
> >     film that has settled by gravity.
> >
> >     I also use straight 40 wt.oil in the TR3, which is not used during
> >     winter months, and have never had any issues.
> >
> >     Just my experiences. I am sure others have different outcomes but
> >     this is what I have found to work for me.
> >
> >     Randall Reihing
> >
> >     ________________________________________
> >     From: Triumphs [triumphs-bounces at autox.team.net] on behalf of
> >     Randall [TR3driver at ca.rr.com]
> >     Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 7:39 PM
> >     To: 'Triumphs'
> >     Subject: Re: [TR] How often should I change oil in triumph that
> >     rarely does muchmileage?
> >
> >         Well, I guess I'm curious about any distinctions between
> >         dinosaur oil and
> >         fully synthetic oils. Recommended oil changes for BMW is now
> >         somewhere in
> >         the 17000 range, isn't it, if using synthetic? And how do the syn
> >         properties react to moisture/contaminant retention?
> >
> >     I dunno, but AFAIK, all the synthetic oil makers still say to
> >     follow the
> >     vehicle manufacturer's recommended oil change intervals.
> >
> >     Long time ago, Mobil 1 said otherwise and even advertised extended oil
> >     change intervals as balancing the higher cost of the oil. Then
> >     someone did
> >     a test where they took a bunch of brand new taxi cabs, filled them
> >     with
> >     Mobil 1, and used the extended change intervals. The test was stopped
> >     earlier than planned, "due to excessive oil consumption". IIRC Mobil
> >     changed their recommendation not long after that.
> >
> >     -- Randall
> >
> >     ** triumphs at autox.team.net **
> >
> >     Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> >     Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> >     Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> >     Unsubscribe/Manage:
> >     http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/randall.reihing@utoledo.edu
> >
> >     ** triumphs at autox.team.net **
> >
> >     Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> >     Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> >     Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> >     Unsubscribe/Manage:
> >     http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/terryrs@comcast.net
> >
> >
> >
> > ** triumphs at autox.team.net **
> >
> > Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> > Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> > Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> > Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/yellowtr@adelphia.net
> 
> 



More information about the Triumphs mailing list