dixie4.wales at virgin.net
Tue Apr 9 10:30:23 MDT 2013
I did say it was on a personal note as I have never had much luck with the
bellows variety, almost every car I bought in my younger days had a faulty
one. It does make you think why there was an almost universal change to wax
type thermostats in the sixties. Could be cheaper to manufacture or just new
improved. I do not know the answer.
Randall has pointed out that the bellows type open slower so this may be a
factor to take into account.
As an aside I do not remember seeing a production skirted wax type
thermostat. I am sure someone will tell me if I am mistaken.
----- Original Message -----
From: "TeriAnn J. Wakeman" <tjwakeman at gmail.com>
To: <triumphs at autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [TR] Thermostats
> On 4/9/13 3:35 AM, Dixie4 wrote:
>> On a final personal note engine rebuilds are expensive and bellows type
>> thermostats were and are notorious for failure so I would not like to
>> risk it. Junk the bellows type as it must have been manufactured 40+
>> years ago
> Really? I had not heard of that nor experienced it. Both my cars came
> with bellows type thermostats. I have had the Land Rover for 35 years as
> of last March and the TR3 since 1986 and have yet to experience a
> thermostat failure.
> I hope metal parts do not go bad sitting on a shelf in a protected
> environment as I have a lot of NLA spares for my cars sitting on shelves,
> including at least 5 new Smiths thermostats.
> ** triumphs at autox.team.net **
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.3272 / Virus Database: 3162/6233 - Release Date: 04/08/13
More information about the Triumphs