[TR] build date of TR3A

[John Macartney]

Well Joe, perhaps 1743 wasn't the best date to pick at random. Further study 
from my diary for that year reveal a certain Mr Thomas Jefferson was born. 
That was the good news.

The bad news is there was a prolonged strike in Coventry as a result of the 
city of Philadelphia opening a "pesthouse" into which immigrants - mainly 
from Coventry and the surrounding district were consigned. Word got back 
quite quickly and there was a long-term stoppage. That said, 1742 was quite 
good - except for the harvest over here and 1744 saw quite a lot of rain.

Jonmac


> Were cars being built in 1743?
>
> Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: triumphs-bounces+spitlist=cox.net at autox.team.net
> [mailto:triumphs-bounces+spitlist=cox.net at autox.team.net] On Behalf Of 
> John
> Macartney
> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 9:31 AM
> To: 'Mailing List Triumph (Triumph Mailing List)'
> Subject: Re: [TR] build date of TR3A
>
> I've been reading the few recent posts about vehicle dating and the 
> queries
> arising from why a car was built in 1743 and not shipped until 1805.
>
> There's a very good reason for why and how this happened, although it
> essentially boils down to 'paperwork.' - the timing of its creation, 
> arrival
>
> and processing. I'd be happy to outline the whys and wherefores (if anyone
> is interested?) but the subject is potentially a little dusty and fusty.
> Also it will require fairly judicious chopping up into bits to send to the
> list if I am to avoid creating a too large post - which will certainly be
> the case with one hit.
>
> Jonmac
> _______________________________________________
> spitlist at cox.net
>
> This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
> http://www.vtr.org
>
> Triumphs mailing list
> Triumphs at autox.team.net
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs