[Land-speed] Charles Nearburg II

[Dave Dahlgren]

Jack I think I understand what you are saying. In my work with sporty type 
cars we really don't care about terminal speed but the best average speed. 
So if more downforce costs 5 mph terminal but cuts.3 secords off a lap time 
a real win. That is the venue traction control works well low speed no 
downforce with lots of torque in the lower gears. Best terminal speed for me 
has always had 5 or 6% slip a little bit of slip and tread deformation is 
good for bite. Dave
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <NT788 at comcast.net>
To: <NT788 at comcast.net>
Cc: <land-speed at autox.team.net>; "Kirkwood" <saltfever at comcast.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 3:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Charles Nearburg II


> List
>
> Please forgive the last sentence about the lie.It wasB clumsy and doesn't
> express whatB I meant!
> jack
>
>
>
>
> Races are won by whoever has the less average lap time,and gets there
> first, not the highest speed at the end of the straightaway.That's what is
> needed at a speed trails (lsr), which is not racing!
>
> B A 100% tire couple can help elapsed time, better than it will help top
> speed, ( where it is impossible to achieve.) To spend time trying to 
> design a
> 100% couple in my opinion is counter productive.
>
> Jack
>
>
>
>
> As reported in almost all publications, they wanted to get the driver back
> into the equation and not a race among automated, robotic machines. A
> mistake-free race is not exciting for the fans. B -Kirk.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Savage Jr.
>
> Thank you Kirk.