[Land-speed] Fw: Re: Ford Flathead

Rich Fox v4gmr at yahoo.com
Fri Aug 6 14:08:33 MDT 2010

--- On Fri, 8/6/10, Rich Fox <v4gmr at yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Rich Fox <v4gmr at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Ford Flathead
To: drmayf at mayfco.com
Date: Friday, August 6, 2010, 12:52 PM

I think if you go to the rule book and use your reading skill you will
appreciate the ludicrousness of your position. I personally will not be lured
into wasting any more time on it.

--- On Fri, 8/6/10, drmayf <drmayf at mayfco.com> wrote:

From: drmayf <drmayf at mayfco.com>
Subject: Re: [Land-speed] Ford Flathead
To: "Rich Fox" <v4gmr at yahoo.com>
Cc: "Kirkwood" <saltfever at comcast.net>, NT788 at comcast.net,
land-speed at autox.team.net
Date: Friday, August 6, 2010, 7:53 AM

Rich! Ok, I got it! So every motor in this class is exactly as it rolled out
the door in an old ford car! It say PRODUCTION engine. Not block. ENGINE!  So
it should have the exact cam, the exact lifters, the exact heads, and so on to
be a PRODUCTION ENGINE.  I can live with that.  So no more high compression
aluminum heads, no releiving of the blocks, no  reverse port technology,  and
so on.  The rules do not say PRODUCTIOON BLOCK. It says PRODUCTION ENGINE. Now
can you read?

Rich Fox wrote:

> For Jack and others who favor blanket amnesty for migrant flatheads I have
> devised a short test. You only have to read one short sentence. But you do
> have to read it. No skimming. Try to concentrate. I will type it in all
> capitals to make it easy........XF CLASS CONSISTS OF ANY PRODUCTION
> read it again if you think you need to. Now the test. If you saw or
> understood....FRENCH ARMY TRUCKS...anywhere in that sentence you may have a
> condition that should be studied.

More information about the Land-speed mailing list