[Healeys] BN2 Fan Belt
bspidell at comcast.net
Sun Oct 17 11:03:55 MDT 2021
This doc--from the government, so it HAS to be true ;)--claims cogged,
or 'synchronous,' are most efficient:
Now I have to deal with smooth/standard, cogged, and 'notched' (what's
On 10/17/2021 8:13 AM, Michael Salter wrote:
> As I recall the original belt for a 100 is a Ferodo V161.
> I have been using a B-45 Gates belts which sit a little lower in the
> pulley but don't contact the bottom of the pulley groove.
> On Sun., Oct. 17, 2021, 10:16 a.m. David P via Healeys,
> <healeys at autox.team.net <mailto:healeys at autox.team.net>> wrote:
> Gates belts has a belt for industrial equipment (non automotive)
> that is an excellent copy of the original. Unfortunately I don't
> remember the part number.. (gets worse with age). I found it
> googling their web pages.. B1 kinda rings a bell.. happy hunting. DP
> On 10/17/2021 8:01 AM, Bob Spidell wrote:
>> I'm going to return it, with '8x10 colored glossy photographs.'
>> On 10/17/2021 6:43 AM, warthodson at aol.com
>> <mailto:warthodson at aol.com> wrote:
>>> The way the vendors find out about an issue is if the customer
>>> tells them. You should forward your message to Moss.
>>> Gary Hodson
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Bob Spidell <bspidell at comcast.net>
>>> <mailto:bspidell at comcast.net>
>>> To: Healeys <healeys at autox.team.net> <mailto:healeys at autox.team.net>
>>> Sent: Sat, Oct 16, 2021 7:52 pm
>>> Subject: [Healeys] BN2 Fan Belt
>>> I finally got around to fixing my loose water pump pulley and
>>> installing a new fan belt. I ordered a 'cogged' belt from
>>> Moss--part# 021-966--thinking it might work better than the
>>> original slab of rubber. I noticed before installing that it was
>>> narrower than the original type that I'd had, which had rotted,
>>> but it looked like it would work. Once I started tensioning it
>>> however, it was clear it /might /work, but sat too low in the
>>> pulleys, and was essentially riding on the bottom of the pulley
>>> grooves instead of on the sides (and the angle of the sides of
>>> the belt was incorrect). Anyone else tried one of these?
>>> I'm shocked, SHOCKED I TELL YA', that a vendor would sell
>>> something that could possibly work, but isn't truly correct.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Healeys