[Healeys] AHCA June Delegates meeting

[John May]

You would have a valid complaint if only your facts were correct.

There was a message to the membership in the presidents column of 
September 2006 where the quorum problem was described and the members 
were asked to provide input to their delegates.

The November 2006, Delegates Meeting minutes, which were made available 
to the Delegates in January, 2007, described the delegates focus group, 
the five options brought forward by that focus group (including counting 
proxies, which the delegates rejected), and the option that the 
delegates finally selected, including the 90 day Healey Marque  notice 
requirement.

The presidents column in March 2007 covered this November delegate 
action, described the delegates choice, and indicated that it is not yet 
final.  That same column announced the Conclave Delegates meeting, even 
though it was not a requirement.  The same issue indicated the November, 
2007,  delegates meeting, including date, location, and contact.  That 
notice has appeared in the Events Calendar of each issue since January, 
2007.

Two of these three communications went directly to the members.  The 
minutes were made available to your delegate, whether or not he/she 
attended any of the meetings.  They are available to any member through 
your Delegates, which you select.  For a report of the discussions and 
deliberations, you should also contact your delegate.

Hardly what I would call zero information to the members.

I know that you have been provided most of this information off-List 
since this discussion arose.  Perhaps you will elect to continue the 
discussion there.  I know I want to get back to trunnion bearings.

John May
no title

(resent with the file size reduced to meet List requirements)

Ronald J. Ray wrote:

>David,
>
>To stay on track with the original email to the list, based on the zero
>information about the revision to the AHCA By-Laws provided to the
>membership by the national officers and Marque editor, the only way I could
>have known about the elimination a quorum requirement was by the fact that I
>attended the June delegates meeting as my local clubs representative.
>
>Ron Ray