[Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width?

[Jason Sukey]

Glen,
     Thanks for the reply.  Only goes to reinforce the practice of assuming
nothing and measuring everything!

Jason

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:50 AM, fubog1 <fubog1 at aol.com> wrote:

> Yes!
> I have run into that on several occasions but can't remember the Timken
> numbers, nor do I have a technical explanation.
> Glen
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Sukey <jsukey at gmail.com>
> To: FOT list <fot at autox.team.net>
> Sent: Thu, Sep 29, 2016 11:31 am
> Subject: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width?
>
> Has anyone else noticed rather large variation in carrier bearing width's
> when rebuilding a spitfire differential?  The one I'm building right now,
> I've replaced what I suspect are the original bearings (Timken England)
> with brand new Timken USA bearings.  In order to reach the required .004"
> preload, it will require .012" LESS total shim than what was in there
> originally.  That seems like a big difference with the only variable being
> new bearings.  I'm using the same housing, same carrier, the bearings
> visually look to be fully pressed home.  Anyone else experience this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason Sukey
> _______________________________________________
> fot at autox.team.net
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/
> options/fot/fubog1 at aol.com
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20160929/b5866f9d/attachment-0001.htm>