[Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width?

fubog1 fubog1 at aol.com
Thu Sep 29 09:50:42 MDT 2016


Yes!
I have run into that on several occasions but can't remember the Timken numbers, nor do I have a technical explanation.
Glen

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Sukey <jsukey at gmail.com>
To: FOT list <fot at autox.team.net>
Sent: Thu, Sep 29, 2016 11:31 am
Subject: [Fot] variation in Timken carrier bearing width?



Has anyone else noticed rather large variation in carrier bearing width's when rebuilding a spitfire differential?  The one I'm building right now, I've replaced what I suspect are the original bearings (Timken England) with brand new Timken USA bearings.  In order to reach the required .004" preload, it will require .012" LESS total shim than what was in there originally.  That seems like a big difference with the only variable being new bearings.  I'm using the same housing, same carrier, the bearings visually look to be fully pressed home.  Anyone else experience this?


Thanks,



Jason Sukey


_______________________________________________
fot at autox.team.net

http://www.fot-racing.com

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/fubog1@aol.com



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20160929/af24d3a3/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Fot mailing list