[Fot] Random Question of the Day

[Kas Kastner]

You have the liberty to use the entire side face of the head for port size
and angle in addition to the cooler inlet mixture.

*Never be beaten by equipment.*

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Terry Stetler <tlizzard at msn.com> wrote:

> Much of it is about valve angles and combustion chamber shape, both of
> which can be far better optimised in a cross flow configuration.   Also you
> don't have your intake sitting on top of your exhaust manifold getting
> baked.   Lower fuel temps equal more BHP.
>
>
> Terry Stetler
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Barr, Scott <sbarr at McCarty-Law.com>
> *To:* FOT list <fot at autox.team.net>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 14, 2015 3:35 PM
> *Subject:* [Fot] Random Question of the Day
>
> So, why is a cross-flow head supposed to make more power than a head with
> intake and exhaust on the same side?   You’d think that once the charge got
> sucked in, squeezed, ignited and blown back out, it wouldn’t have any clear
> idea of which side of the head it had come in on in the first place.
>
>
>
> What gives?
>
>
>
> Scott B.
> _______________________________________________
> fot at autox.team.net
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/tlizzard@msn.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fot at autox.team.net
>
> http://www.fot-racing.com
>
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Unsubscribe/Manage:
> http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/kaskastner@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20151214/e0770472/attachment-0001.htm>