[Fot] 7" PAUTER RODS?

[fubog1]

 The stock compression height is 2.0.
There is room for the 7 inch rod, it will be right at the bottom of the oil
ring groove, with a thin ring pack.
The rod/stroke ratio isn't that bad on these engines but generally anything
that reduces loads is a good thing...
Glen





-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Alexander <n197tr4 at cs.com>
To: fot <fot at autox.team.net>
Sent: Wed, Mar 7, 2012 9:42 am
Subject: [Fot] 7" PAUTER RODS?


 Anyone have any experience with 7.00" RODS?



This is an inquiry from some I apparently met in Portland, OR



He refers to a similar kit from Cambridge.



TIA.











-----Original Message-----

From: John Styduhar <johnstydo at gmail.com>

To: Joe Alexander <n197tr4 at cs.com>

Sent: Wed, Mar 7, 2012 5:26 am

Subject: Re: Message from The Vintage Racer







By the way, do you have any experience building up a long rod 4 pot.  I've

been talking with Pauter and they can make up a set of 7" rods and Wiseco

pistons for the 87 mm sleeves.  This is similar to the setup that Cambridge

Motorsports sells using Carrilo rods and JE pistons.  I can't seem to find
any

specs in the service manual on the stock piston compression height ( I think

it's 2") or ring landing locations to see if the wrist pin on the long rod

will intersect the oil scraper ring groove.  This is not a stroker kit, but

Cambridge advertises that longer conrods reduce piston speed and contact
area.

What do you think?





On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Joe Alexander <n197tr4 at cs.com> wrote:



 John,

_______________________________________________

fot at autox.team.net



http://www.fot-racing.com



Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html

Archive: http://www.team.net/archive

Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

Unsubscribe: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/fubog1@aol.com