[Roadsters] 1600 v 2000? OR BOTH MAYBE??

Tim tputland at charter.net
Thu Mar 20 15:24:16 MST 2008


Wellllllllllll......I have both so there you go. I would love to have a short windshield with either engine, but that is not an option as I am too tall to drive them. But I must say, my 1600 is getting a five speed tranny eventually. It just begs for one more gear, even more so since I started running a GB dizzy. And one of the two runners might end up with a flat dash as I love that look as well.

PEACE :-)

Tim
Belleville, WI.
'70 SPL AND SRL
Still clueless but always learning

---- "Gregory S. Morrison" <gsm at gregorysmorrison.com> wrote: 

=============
I've seen several ground up restorations of 1600s and 2000s. All things
being equal, the cost is very similar. So, other than "because it's been in
my family for years", or "because I like 1600s better than 2000s", why are
some people pouring a ton of money into restoring a stock 1600? Why not go
with a 2000? Same car, but with more gears and more power.

Just curious.

Greg
SRL31100494
You are subscribed as tputland at charter.net

Datsun-roadsters mailing list

http://www.team.net/archive

http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/datsun-roadsters


More information about the Datsun-roadsters mailing list