To: | "MalcolmCox" <malcox@attglobal.net>, <vintage-race@autox.team.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Re: NASCAR vs. Vintage Racing? Part I |
From: | "John A. Rollins" <nobozos@ix.netcom.com> |
Date: | Tue, 7 Aug 2001 05:49:35 -0400 |
Which, I'm sure, was a comforting thought to his drivers... *8o) ----- Original Message ----- From: "MalcolmCox" <malcox@attglobal.net> To: <vintage-race@autox.team.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:35 AM Subject: Re: Re: NASCAR vs. Vintage Racing? Part I > And there was Colin Chapman at scrutineering claiming that the roll bar on the 18 ( I think ) met > regulation height because there was no regulation height and therefore the chassis tube could be > considered the roll bar. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Re: NASCAR vs. Vintage Racing? Part I, MalcolmCox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | For Sale--Datsun 2000 Race Car, Ryan, Richard |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: NASCAR vs. Vintage Racing? Part I, MalcolmCox |
Next by Thread: | Re: NASCAR vs. Vintage Racing? Part I, Tombread |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |