I like the stainless look. Not sure why.
Tom
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 22, 2011, at 2:26 PM, cfmtr3a@verizon.net wrote:
> LOL 12 responses - 3 for SS; 3 for Chrome; 3 for either; 3 for neither
>(detracts from the looks of the car). Anyone want to be the tie breaker.
>
> General consensus
> Chrome looks better - bright chrome like bumpers - must be diligent in waxing
>- will eventually rust - (In stock);
> Stainless Steel less likely to rust - closer in appearance to the beading -
>less shiny - (3-6 week delay)
>
> Since I live in the land of 80%+ humidity the scales are tipping slightly -
>ever so slightly - toward stainless. I wonder how the concourse judges might
>react - not that I am looking at a 100/400 pt car.
>
> Thanks to all that responded on or off list - additional responses still
>appreciated.
> Carl
>
>
> Feb 19, 2011 04:27:06 PM, cfmtr3a@verizon.net wrote:
>
> A question for the collective wisdom of the list -
>
> I am ready to buy a luggage rack for my TR3 project. I have decided on the
> type that attaches to the hinges rather than drilling holes. The only
> question is whether there is an advantage between stainless steel and chrome
> (cost is the same).
>
> Any and all comments or recommendations are welcomed.
>
> Thanks
> Carl
> 1961 TR3A TS81802LO
> Tampa, Florida
>
> _______________________________________________
> Triumphs@autox.team.net
> Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
> Suggested annual donation $11.47
> Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
> Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
> Manage your account:
>http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/triumphs/tbe749@aol.com
>
_______________________________________________
Triumphs@autox.team.net
Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $11.47
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
|