Actually, Andrew had it right, too.
You wrote: c +3 = (pi * d) +3
He wrote circumference + 3 = pi * d + 3
These are equivalent but yours is explicit whereas his is implicit and
dependent on the rules of precedence. When evaluating his equation you perform
the
multiplication before the addition which is the same as what you spelled out
with your parentheses. To avoid confusion your representation is preferred but
either is correct.
And his answer 3/pi is nearly equal to your one foot result. More accurate,
in fact, but either is close enough for our purposes.
Dave
In a message dated 11/20/2007 10:50:34 AM Central Standard Time,
cfmtr3a@verizon.net writes:
> Andrew -
> your formula is wrong:
> c= circumference
>
> c= pi * d is correct
>
> c +3 = (pi * d) +3
>
> however your answer is correct - the diameter would increase by
> approximately 1 ft.
> your formula would have increased the diameter by 3ft.
>
> Carl
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Uprichard" <auprichard@comcast.net>
> To: <eric.frenken@brits-n-pieces.com>; "'Kent Shrack'"
> <kentshrack@yahoo.com>; <triumphs@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 6:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [TR] length of string - long
>
>
> >The distance is 3/(2*pi) in both cases.
> >
> >circumference = pi * d
> >
> >circumference + 3 = pi * d + 3
> > = pi * (d + 3/pi)
> >
> >The diameter increases by 3/pi regardless of the starting diameter.
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register
http://www.vtr.org
http://www.team.net/donate.html
Triumphs@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs
|