triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [SPIT6CGT6] Re: Really Wierd Behaviour - diaphram differences

To: "Jim Muller" <jimmuller@pop.mail.rcn.net>, <triumphs@autox.team.net>, "'SPIT6CGT6@egroups.com'" <SPIT6CGT6@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [SPIT6CGT6] Re: Really Wierd Behaviour - diaphram differences
From: "ptegler@cablespeed" <ptegler@cablespeed.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 15:53:32 -0400
References: <3EC7A40E.23023.125D567@localhost>
You are correct in your 'beliefs' concerning the hydraulic
seals.  The synthetic hydraulic seals have a 'sealed' surface
type of rubber and are not as porous as the natural
rubber. Hence the difference in reactions/disintegration rates
due to different grades (dot 3/4/5) of brake fluids.

Paul Tegler
ptegler@cablespeed.com
www.teglerizer.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Muller" <jimmuller@pop.mail.rcn.net>
To: <triumphs@autox.team.net>; "'SPIT6CGT6@egroups.com'"
<SPIT6CGT6@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [SPIT6CGT6] Re: Really Wierd Behaviour - diaphram differences


> On 18 May 2003 at 14:03, ptegler@cablespeed wrote:
>
> > Two are thinner, and exhibit properties closer to natural
> > rubber. (more pliable and shiny and soft texture.)
> > One is much thicker and looks/feels more like synthetic
> > rubber.
>
> I can't offer any advice about carb diaphrams, but I do have a
> curiosity.  I had thought, from people's comments here, that with
> regards clutch and brake cyliner seals, the shiny, soft ones were
> synthetic and the dull-finished ones were real rubber.  But then
> perhaps there is no parallel between the properties of rubber in carb
> diaphrams vs. hydraulic seals.
>
> Just an observation...

///  triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>