Re: Points Gap

[George Hahn <geohahn@azstarnet.com>]

ArthurK101@aol.com wrote:
> 
> OK, gang.  I think I've solved the problem.  I'll give you my solution and
> then if someone could give me the symptom, I'll know I'm right.
> 
> Point gap was about .012, manual calls for .015.

I would very much doubt that this alone (.003 difference in the gap)
would amount to a significant change in performance.  Could be wrong
(often am) but would guess that your intermittent problem still is.

Geo Hahn
59 TR3A