triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

SB-42 Classic Car Smog

To: senator.kopp@SEN.CA.GOV (Return requested)
Subject: SB-42 Classic Car Smog
From: Peter Mchugh <Peter.Mchugh@faa.dot.gov>
Date: 11 Jun 1997 16:46:40 -0400
Alternate-recipient: Allowed
Cc: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net (Return requested)
Conversion: Allowed
Disclose-recipients: Prohibited
Original-encoded-information-types: IA5-Text
X400-content-type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
X400-mts-identifier: [/c=US/admd=ATTMAIL/prmd=gov+dot/; 02B51339F0EB0072-MTAdot1]
X400-originator: Peter.Mchugh@faa.dot.gov
X400-received: by mta MTAdot1 in /c=US/admd=ATTMAIL/prmd=gov+dot/; converted ( IA5-Text); Relayed; 11 Jun 1997 16:46:40 -0400
X400-received: by /c=US/admd=ATTMAIL/prmd=gov+dot/; converted ( IA5-Text); Relayed; 11 Jun 1997 16:46:40 -0400
X400-recipients: non-disclosure; <02B51339F0EB0072*/c=US/admd=ATTmail/prmd=gov+dot/o=faa/s=Mchugh/g=Peter/@MHS>

     
     Senator Kopp,
     
     Even though not a constituent I want to applaud your efforts in 
     introducing SB-42.  California has long been a leader in application 
     of sound, and strong environmental provisions...and I for one support 
     your state's efforts in that regard.  On the other hand, the rational 
     approach suggested by your bill, which would exempt older (25 years) 
     automobiles, is essential to preserving the history and economy 
     attached to the collectors hobby.  It is terribly important that your 
     bill pass, as it will be an important precedent in other states 
     (including mine) where restrictive legislation is under consideration.
     
     Generally, people who operate such vehicles keep them in the best 
     possible condition.  The vehicles are the training tools on which many 
     young people learn how to keep and maintain autos they will someday 
     own themselves...and an important element in giving them knowledge 
     which will help their cars meet future environmental standards.  The 
     desire to have these vehicles operate efficiently is absolutely 
     compatible with the need for clean air, and SB-42 recognizes that new 
     standards, while necessary, should not be applied to older technology 
     vehicles in a draconian way.
     
     Owners of collectable autos generally operate the vehicles far less 
     (far fewer miles) than if they were in use as principal conveyance 
     (perhaps less than 1000-1500 miles per year), and those owners with 
     whom I speak, are universally concerned about the environment.  In 
     many respects collectors contribute to the local community by sharing 
     their cars, small pieces of history, with neighbors and tourists, at 
     shows and parades. 
     
     The economic value of the after-market industry that has grown around 
     the restoration and showing of these automobiles should also not be 
     underestimated.  California is a center for such activity and demise 
     of the vehicles for which the industry exists will have significant 
     tax revenue implications.
     
     Again, I commend you for taking the stand you have chosen, and wish 
     you future success.
     
     
     
     Peter McHugh
     Annandale, Virginia
     
     76 Spitfire
     73 Triumph TR-6
     72 Triumph GT-6
     69 Triumph GT-6+ (2)
     
        

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>